Blunt 7 January 2008 article in The Times by Nicola Woolcock asserting that "teacher technophobia" is behind the extensive failure of schools to make effective use of ICT, despite the billions of earmarked funding spent on ICT in schools by the UK government. The article coincides with the annual BETT exhibition and brochure-fest. Extract:
"State schools spent £1 billion on cutting-edge information technology last year but 80 per cent of them are failing to make full use of it, according to experts.
Pupils now handle equipment worth thousands of pounds, with some using laptops, interactive whiteboards or hand-held smartphones. The Government claims that Britain is a European leader in installing IT in the classroom.
However, Becta, the Government’s adviser on IT in schools, says that many teachers are intimidated by the equipment and struggle to cope, and that children have a better understanding of how it works.
Britain is one of the biggest spenders per head on technology in schools worldwide, according to Becta — formerly the British Educational Communications and Technology Agency — and the amount is growing each year. Yet Andrew Pinder, its chairman, said: 'We are achieving nothing like the impact that we should from this technology. We spend more than other countries but not enough schools are using technology effectively.'"
Pinder's views do not seem to have changed much since his appointment as the chair of Becta (see this discussion on a keynote he gave at the Oxford Internet Institute in November 2006). I agree with him on the need to do things on a large scale to get the costs down and the quality up, and to avoid parallel reinventions or purchasing of the same wheel in countless small units, be these colleges and schools, or LEAs.
But the "teacher technophobia" angle seems to reveal a bit of a blind spot, and, possibly, a reluctance to take account of research such as Becta's own eSIR study. In the developed world, ICT permeates middle class citizens' lives (including teachers') generally. So perhaps the real problem is the way that "technology for my work" is often so different from "technology for my life". The reason that you use Google, Wikipedia, Facebook, The Trainline, etc etc is because these services help you with the "stuff" of your life. The key to getting ICT used in schools is to have it designed, supported, and run in a way which helps learners, schools, and teachers with the "stuff" of education. That this is not the case in many schools is a complex issue, which should not be reduced to "teacher technophobia".
The $75 laptop
Pixel Qi, led by ex One Laptop Per Child CTO Mary Lou Jepson, is a "spin-out" from OLPC:
What is becoming clearer by the day is that the toughest "digital divide" nut to crack concerns connectivity rather than devices. Currently there is a commendable push in England to ensure that school pupils can be online from home irrespective of parental income. The price of devices is falling very fast, driven by the market and by the arrival of next generation devices like OLPC and the Asus EEE, which cost about as little as a middling mobile phone. Connectivity is a much bigger challenge, for at least reasons:
Ultimately Internet access in a developed economy like the UK's must be seen simply as a citizen's entitlement, like getting a drink of mains water. The challenge for Governments and public authorities is to bring this about. (Maybe some kind of public/private partnership based on FON - in which broad-band customers with local WiFi make this available to people nearby - or an equivalent of it, will provide one of the solutions).
Posted on 10/01/2008 in News and comment | Permalink | Comments (2)
|