This 3 page summary of Retirement, health and relationships in the older population in England: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing 2004, edited by James Banks, Elizabeth Breeze, Carli Lessof and James Nazroo (eds.), published by the Institute for Fiscal Studies in June 2006 is, overall, a model of clarity, as well being a stark reminder of the extent of health inequality. Here is an extract:
"Across the [English] population, there is a strong relationship between wealth levels and both mortality and morbidity. For example, people from the poorest 20 per cent of the wealth spectrum were much more likely to die between the first and second wave of the survey [the waves of the study were two years apart] than their richer counterparts. Unsurprisingly, the older people were more likely to die, but the differential pattern by wealth is consistent across all age groups and strongest for the youngest. Of those aged 50–59 in the first interview 2.5 per cent of the poorest fifth had died, compared to only 0.2 per cent of the richest fifth. Of those aged 60–74, deaths accounted for 5.9 per cent of the poorest and 1.3 per cent of the richest."
A different angle on the term "managed learning environment" - building schools for the future.
Slightly sceptical article in the 7/10/2006 Economist about the current English "building schools for the future" programme which will see nearly every secondary school in England completely rebuilt or heavily modernised over the next 15 years. Many (most?) of the contracts will be won by private consortia who will get a return on the 50% of the capital costs they put up by charging for their services for the subsequent 25 years. The Economist picks up on the use of the term managed learning environment by the consortium that has just won the contract to rebuild Bristol's schools:
From the point of view of ICT provision, a key concern will be how much scope a school has to make changes to the set-up, once the school is built. The costs of making changes to out-sourced ICT systems are typically high: the supplier will tend simply to "want to get its rent"; and teachers and learners wanting to try out new things may find they get short shrift. And you could imagine, when a Local Authority is choosing between different bids, that the long term suitability of the ICT offering from a curriculum point of view might be both a harder thing to judge, and of a lower priority, than the design of the buildings.
Posted on 08/10/2006 in News and comment | Permalink | Comments (2)
|