I put the World Wide Web Consortium's Markup Validator down as 5th in my Top Ten Tools in Jane Hart's recent survey. I was alone in this amongst over 100 other respondents. Maybe this points in part to a general doubt in the e-learning world about the value and relevance of making web content conform to W3C standards. (Fortnightly Mailing tries, but sometimes fails to conform.) According to W3C, the Markup Validator has just been updated "with improved accuracy and performance" and "an automatic cleanup option using HTML Tidy". The latter feature is a particularly useful and time-saving one.
« Harold Pinter's Nobel Lecture: Art, Truth and Politics | Main | If only our logo was more expressive »
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Posts
- A leaving speech
- How algorithms manipulate the market
- Clayton Wright's Educational Technology and Education Conferences, January to June 2016
- Alphabet
- Paul Mason's Postcapitalism - talk and discussion
- FE Area Based Reviews should start by making an assessment of need
- Citizen Maths - powerful ideas in action
- Robotics - someone who ran DARPA's Robotics Challenge looks ahead
- On the long-term future of artificial intelligence
- A ten year old interview
Recent Comments
- David Hughes on A leaving speech
- Liz Perry on A leaving speech
- Khaled on If ever you need a really comprehensive "title" drop-down
- Mark Sosa on If ever you need a really comprehensive "title" drop-down
- Richard Stacy on Video and Online Learning: Critical Reflections and Findings From the Field
- Mike Jones on "The Facebook" Kyle McGrath's August 2005 assessment
- G Kelly on Syria-related readings
- Kris Sittler on Second report from Keith Devlin's and Coursera’s Introduction to Mathematical Thinking MOOC
- Robert McGuire on Second report from Keith Devlin's and Coursera’s Introduction to Mathematical Thinking MOOC
- Keith Devlin on Second report from Keith Devlin's and Coursera’s Introduction to Mathematical Thinking MOOC
Comments