Citizendium has been set up by Larry Sanger, one of the original founders of Wikipedia. Currently it has less than one thousandth as many articles as Wikipedia. All its content is developed by people who have signed up under a Statement of Fundamental Policies:
"Authors: all contributors have "author" rights on the Citizendium. They can start new articles, edit existing articles, engage other contributors in discussion about articles, etc.
Editors: editors, in addition, have the right to make (or work together with other editors in making) plans, policies, and decisions for particular articles, and eventually will have the right to designate particular versions of articles as "approved." As a rule of thumb, editors in traditionally "academic" fields will require the qualifications typically needed for a tenure-track academic position in the field, while editors in more "professional" fields require the usual terminal professional degree in the field plus significant experience and publishing."
So, even if all you want to do is to correct a typo or other minor error, you have to apply for an account to do so. I want it to succeed, but the hurdles you have to jump to get involved make me sceptical that it will efficiently capture knowledge for re-use in the way that Wikipedia seems to. It would be interesting to test it by seeding both it and Wikipedia with identical articles, and monitoring the way these develop over time and the amount of use they get. Maybe someone has already done this?
The Scotsman reports that the Interactive University is to shut at the end of May
Updated with footnote, and with link to 2004 report by Sara Frank Bristow, on 28/4/2007
On 17/4/2007, The Scotsman reported that the Interactive University (IU), which has been held up as one of the few UK examples of apparently* successful large-scale provision of on line university-level education, and which was recruiting staff until recently, "is to close its doors at the end of next month", after "it failed to attract participation from the majority of Scottish universities and a bid for a lifeline £1.5 million from Scottish Enterprise was refused". For a detailed review of the Interactive University, written for the UKeUniversity before the latter had the plug finally pulled on it, see this 2004 report by Sara Frank Bristow, edited by Paul Bacsich [180 kB DOC].
* I say "apparently" as I am very sceptical about the approach to content development described by the IU. In my experience "ensuring that the whole content production process is completely independent of the end method of delivery" is neither a realistic nor a desirable endeavour.
Posted on 18/04/2007 in News and comment | Permalink | Comments (0)
|