Long
article in First Monday by Lorcan Dempsey about the impact on libraries of "always on / always connected" devices. Excerpt:
"As networking spreads, we have multiple connection points which offer
different grades of experience (the desktop, cell phone, xBox or Wii,
GPS system, smartphone, ultra–portable notebook, and so on). While
these converge in various ways, they are also optimized for different
purposes. A natural accompaniment of this mesh of connection points is
a move of many services to the cloud, available on the network across
these multiple devices and environments. This means that an exclusive
focus on the institutional Web site as the primary delivery mechanism
and the browser as the primary consumption environment is increasingly
partial."
The general point made applies equally to students and to employees in their on-line relationships with their school/college/university/employer, and squares with some thinking we've been doing in a mobile learning initiative at
The Sheffield College, where I am a Governor.
Specifically, what policies should govern learner's access to the Internet when in college using their own devices, and how should these differ (if at all) from the policies that apply when they are using college-provided devices? (Answer, content filtering other than by connectivity suppliers is increasingly irrelevant.)
And, if learners are using a wide range of devices to access college and other learning-related services, who is best placed to host and configure these for distribution to such devices? (Answer, surely, third parties with the expertise and above all large scale to do it well.)
National Audit Office diagrams showing the gross over-complexity of the English learning and skills system
Source: Reskilling for recovery - 16/1/2009, page 94
Reskilling for recovery - 16/1/2009 [1.88 MB PDF] is a recent report of the House of Commons Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee, which examines "how responses to the agenda set out in the Leitch Report would affect the broader structures of further education (FE), higher education (HE) and lifelong learning".
It contains an Appendix, supplied by the National Audit Office with, on pages 94 to 97, four "function maps" showing the functions and relationships on November 2008 of the key organisation in England with a hand in the provision of education and training. Simple the system certainly is not - "The charts in particular speak for themselves showing how complicated the system has become" - and, if the Committee's recommendations are acted on, we can expect complexity and reducing it to feature in a future National Audit Office review of the training system. On this subject, Frank Coffield's diagrams [130 kB PDF] from his "The Impact of Policy on Learning and Inclusion in the New Learning and Skills Sector" are worth reviewing. If anything they show the situation to be even worse than the National Audit Office diagrams indicate.
December 2006 Fortnightly Mailing piece about the Leitch Review of Skills.
Posted on 24/01/2009 in News and comment | Permalink | Comments (0)
|