This 13/1/2009 Ofsted report, [28 pages, 130 kB PDF], describes itself as a survey which "evaluates how VLEs are developing with a selection of providers" in the school (primary through to secondary) and FE sectors, including work-based learning providers, and adult and community learning providers.
The selection of 41 providers (all in England, where Ofsted functions, and all visited between January and May 2008) is wide and representative, and the survey is unusual in that it is issued by an organisation that takes a hard nosed possibly pedestrian line that focuses on learners and learning, with no in built enthusiasm for technology. The survey includes two case studies - one based on Havering College, and the other on the TeesLearn VLE platform.
The "key findings", which make depressing if predictable reading, and the "recommendations" are below in full in the continuation post below.
Anyone responsible for VLE use, or for policy in this area should read the report in full. (My own reaction to it is that it is slightly off the pace with what the best providers are doing, and that it could have been more explicit about the benefits of "doing VLE things" at scale - as in the Scottish GLOW initiative. And are Ofsted and its predecessors in part contributors to the basically rather dire state of affairs reported, through its failure to integrate concrete assessment of the effectiveness of VLE use into the inspection regime?)
David Wiley's "Openness and the Disaggregated Future of Higher Education"
In 1998 my enthusiasm for openness was given a boost (or started?) by David Wiley and the Open Content license that he developed. At that time the use of such licenses, which have been superseded and absorbed by Creative Commons, was very rare. (The LeTTOL course was originally published under an Open Content License, though this seems no longer to be the case.) Ten years later, David Wiley's influence has grown a great deal, and his 85 slide presentation Openness and the Disaggregated Future of Higher Education deserves to be widely viewed, though you can only follow Wiley's argument to a certain extent from his slides; and without that you cannot develop a critique or endorsement of it.
[With thanks to Dan Barker for highlighting this.]
Posted on 28/11/2008 in News and comment, Resources | Permalink | Comments (0)
|