Updated 5/12/2007 with link, also via Weinberger, to Mark Pilgrim's "Future of Reading".
Long and interesting piece by David Everything is Miscellaneous Weinberger about the future of books and libraries, written as a response to Anthony Grafton's Future Reading - Digitisation and its Discontents in the New Yorker. Weinberger is no "anti-library philistine" - he is notably enthusiastic about libraries and librarians - but that does not stop him from acknowledging what he describes as the "existing and coming
discontinuity" in the way that knowledge is/will be stored, mediated, and distributed, and the changing role of printed material. Weinberger's article, which is worth reading in full, concludes:
"Many of us share Grafton's nostalgia for books. But what
will we
miss about them, truly? The way they feel and smell? What does that
have to do with knowledge, wisdom, understanding? We should not be
shaping our systems of
education and learning around the fetishes of collectors.
When we have interactive, networked, paper-quality devices, we will say good bye to books, and good riddance.
And our hearts will break a little."
I suppose my feeling is that the "when" should be more of a "maybe", notwithstanding Amazon's Kindle. Having stuff to refer to, search, annotate etc - a lot of it - on or accessible from a device is one thing. Getting down to some serious reading on a device rather than on paper is another, and the sheer utility and flexibility of print for this, in the bath, in bed etc., will take some beating. [5/12/2007] And for a provocative and much deeper and broader view, see Mark Pilgrim's 19/11/2007 The Future of Reading - A Play in Six Acts.
Categorising information on the way out?
Donald Clark strikes a cord in Are we outsourcing memory?
It is easy to think of Donald's:
as stating the obvious; but plenty of people (and policies) fail to recognise how far "plain old web search", alongside the use of alerting mechanisms like RSS or Google Alerts, and a bit (lot?) of tacit nous is increasingly how, in the developed world at least, knowledge is mediated for users, rather than visits to portals or repositories or gateways or other places where dedicated and committed professionals have spent time systematically organising, tagging, and cataloging material. (I know I've not got this quite right yet, but what is now happening feels to be that rather than the publisher, host, or owner of material needing to "categorise information on the way in", the user can "categorise it on the way out", with shape given to information by the user's choice of search terms, by the judgment he or she then exercises, and by the algorithms that rank-order what the user finds.)
Posted on 19/12/2007 in News and comment | Permalink | Comments (1)
|